PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIMB vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIMB vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIM S.A. (TIMB) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TIMB having a 7.18% return and DGRW slightly higher at 7.35%.


TIMB

1D
-1.29%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
7.18%
6M
8.36%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*

DGRW

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.02%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIMB vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TIMB
TIM S.A.
7.18%86.96%-33.24%68.57%4.05%-13.46%23.03%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.35%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TIMB and DGRW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIMB vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIMB
TIMB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TIMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TIMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIMB vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIM S.A. (TIMB) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMBDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.28

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

9.75

-7.79

TIMB vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIMB and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIMB vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIMB drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIMB and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMBDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-32.04%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.89%

-8.30%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

-16.21%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.08%

-17.27%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.89%

-2.42%

-23.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

-3.01%

-9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.18%

1.94%

+7.24%

Volatility

TIMB vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

TIM S.A. (TIMB) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.64%. This indicates that TIMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMBDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

3.64%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.33%

8.21%

+17.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.52%

10.27%

+21.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.56%

14.01%

+17.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

16.24%

+15.86%

Dividends

TIMB vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

TIMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than DGRW's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.29%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
TIMB
TIM S.A.
8.79%11.67%6.03%4.98%4.05%3.43%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIMB and DGRW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIMB has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to DGRW (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIMB dropped -37.08% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIMB and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer