PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILT vs. RAFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILT vs. RAFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than RAFE's 15.70% return.


TILT

1D
-0.58%
1M
1.27%
6M
8.81%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
13.71%

RAFE

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.59%
6M
13.30%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILT vs. RAFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
11.64%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%27.61%16.05%0.99%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
15.70%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TILT and RAFE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.92

The correlation between TILT and RAFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILT vs. RAFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILT vs. RAFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TILTRAFEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.78

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

14.72

-3.08

TILT vs. RAFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the RAFE Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILT and RAFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TILT vs. RAFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than RAFE's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and RAFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILTRAFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-35.74%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-7.46%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-16.36%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-24.28%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.06%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-6.13%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.91%

+0.07%

Volatility

TILT vs. RAFE - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) at 2.78%. This indicates that TILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILTRAFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

2.78%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

8.59%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

11.34%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

15.07%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

19.33%

-0.64%

TILT vs. RAFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RAFE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILT vs. RAFE - Dividend Comparison

TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than RAFE's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.49%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.08%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILT and RAFE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILT has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to RAFE (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs RAFE's -35.74%.

On 5-year performance, TILT leads with 11.68% vs 11.46% for RAFE. On fees, TILT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RAFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TILT has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TILT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.08% for TILT.

TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILT and RAFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer