PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILT vs. IUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILT vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.


TILT

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
13.96%

IUS

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.71%
6M
15.69%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILT vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
10.68%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%27.61%16.05%29.01%-15.37%
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
15.71%16.94%16.51%20.79%-8.34%32.17%15.09%29.34%-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TILT and IUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.90

The correlation between TILT and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

TILT vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TILT
IUS

Technology

27.2%
22.4%

Financial Services

16.0%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.7%

Industrials

10.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

9.4%
12.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
14.7%

Energy

4.8%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.4%
1.0%

Technology

TILT
27.2%
IUS
22.4%

Financial Services

TILT
16.0%
IUS
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TILT
10.9%
IUS
10.7%

Industrials

TILT
10.1%
IUS
9.7%

Healthcare

TILT
9.4%
IUS
12.8%

Communication Services

TILT
8.6%
IUS
14.7%

Energy

TILT
4.8%
IUS
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

TILT
4.7%
IUS
7.4%

Real Estate

TILT
3.1%
IUS
0.5%

Basic Materials

TILT
2.7%
IUS
3.3%

Utilities

TILT
2.4%
IUS
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILT vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS
IUS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILT vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILTIUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.60

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

5.44

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

23.27

-8.56

TILT vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILT and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILTIUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

3.26

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.91

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Drawdowns

TILT vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than IUS's maximum drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and IUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILTIUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-34.67%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-6.15%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-15.61%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-18.72%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.07%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-3.86%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.43%

+0.51%

Volatility

TILT vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that TILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILTIUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.50%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

7.41%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

10.26%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

15.00%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

18.04%

+0.71%

TILT vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TILT vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS
Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF
1.28%1.48%1.52%1.72%1.78%1.46%1.74%1.77%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.07%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TILT and IUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TILT has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs IUS's -34.67%.

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 11.59% for TILT. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TILT.

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.07% for TILT.

TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.19% for IUS.

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILT and IUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer