TILT vs. BUFH
TILT (FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TILT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. TILT is passively managed, while BUFH is actively managed. Over the past year, TILT returned 24.72% vs 6.20% for BUFH. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TILT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
TILT vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 3.05% return.
TILT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.47%
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $306.65K | $225.75K | $191.92K | |
| $630.91K | $1.40M | $1.78M |
TILT vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund | 11.94% | 13.59% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 3.05% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILT and BUFH is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TILT and BUFH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILT vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
TILT
BUFH
TILT vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TILT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.55 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.95 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 18.47 | -6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TILT vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -1.53% | -36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -1.53% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -0.17% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.33% | +1.64% |
Volatility
TILT vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) at 0.53%. This indicates that TILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILT | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 0.53% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 1.88% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 2.41% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 2.33% | +15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 2.33% | +16.37% |
TILT vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILT vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILT FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund | 1.07% | 1.15% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.60% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.55% | 1.60% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILT and BUFH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TILT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to BUFH (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs BUFH's -1.53%.
On 1-year performance, TILT leads with 24.72% vs 6.20% for BUFH. On fees, TILT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BUFH has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TILT has performed better with a 24.72% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TILT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
TILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
TILT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.95% for BUFH.
BUFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILT and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer