PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILE vs. CEPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TILE vs. CEPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILE achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than CEPU's -15.54% return.


TILE

1D
-2.89%
1M
1.35%
6M
7.98%
YTD
15.94%
1Y
51.84%
3Y*
52.76%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
8.29%

CEPU

1D
-3.15%
1M
-7.34%
6M
-9.66%
YTD
-15.54%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
35.47%
5Y*
47.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILE vs. CEPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TILE
Interface, Inc.
15.94%14.94%93.36%28.46%-37.92%52.33%-35.88%18.47%-43.11%
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
-15.54%20.77%60.75%71.30%95.14%15.93%-44.44%-45.56%-42.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TILE and CEPU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.19

The correlation between TILE and CEPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TILE:

$1.88B

CEPU:

$2.22B

EPS

TILE:

$3.21

CEPU:

ARS 4.58K

PE Ratio

TILE:

10.06

CEPU:

4.79

PEG Ratio

TILE:

0.21

CEPU:

0.01

PS Ratio

TILE:

0.90

CEPU:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

TILE:

$1.42B

CEPU:

ARS 2.01T

Gross Profit (TTM)

TILE:

$553.14M

CEPU:

ARS 701.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

TILE:

$198.07M

CEPU:

ARS 855.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILE vs. CEPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILE
TILE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TILE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TILE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CEPU
CEPU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILE vs. CEPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TILECEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

0.83

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

1.95

+2.25

TILE vs. CEPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CEPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILE and CEPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TILE vs. CEPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILE drawdown since its inception was -92.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CEPU drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILE and CEPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILECEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.60%

-88.97%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.88%

-40.74%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.61%

-51.70%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.36%

-51.70%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.13%

-17.66%

+7.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-54.64%

+16.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.39%

17.37%

-4.98%

Volatility

TILE vs. CEPU - Volatility Comparison

Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU) have volatilities of 12.43% and 12.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILECEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

12.98%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.23%

32.20%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.12%

67.42%

-29.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.84%

57.06%

-14.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.03%

61.21%

-16.18%

Dividends

TILE vs. CEPU - Dividend Comparison

TILE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while CEPU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.64%8.91%2.78%0.00%0.00%2.44%3.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILE
Interface, Inc.
0.31%0.21%0.16%0.32%0.41%0.25%0.90%1.57%1.82%0.99%1.19%0.94%

Financials

TILE vs. CEPU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interface, Inc. and Central Puerto S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20TOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
331.04M
1.16T
(TILE) Total Revenue
(CEPU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TILE values in USD, CEPU values in ARS

TILE vs. CEPU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Interface, Inc. and Central Puerto S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
38.3%
35.7%
Portfolio components
TILE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a gross profit of 126.72M and revenue of 331.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.

CEPU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported a gross profit of 415.00B and revenue of 1.16T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

TILE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Interface, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.33M and revenue of 331.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

CEPU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported an operating income of 310.62B and revenue of 1.16T, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

TILE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a net income of 23.61M and revenue of 331.04M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

CEPU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported a net income of 440.08B and revenue of 1.16T, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TILE and CEPU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEPU has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to TILE (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILE dropped -92.60% vs CEPU's -88.97%.

TILE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILE and CEPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer