TIHGX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
TIHGX is managed by Investment House Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2001. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | -11.34% | 10.35% | 31.44% | 49.94% | -37.04% | 21.26% | 39.61% | 32.82% | -4.47% | 34.06% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 1.60% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIHGX achieves a -11.34% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TIHGX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
TIHGX
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -11.34%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
AMRGX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -8.89%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIHGX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIHGX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
TIHGX
AMRGX
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIHGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.71 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.25 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 2.91 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIHGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.71 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.35 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.10 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIHGX and AMRGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
TIHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than AMRGX's 17.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIHGX The Investment House Growth Fund | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.48% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 17.54% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIHGX drawdown since its inception was -57.34%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIHGX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIHGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.34% | -80.32% | +22.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.95% | -13.98% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.66% | -35.42% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -35.42% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -11.44% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -40.45% | +30.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 5.78% | -0.91% |
Volatility
TIHGX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Investment House Growth Fund (TIHGX) is 6.37%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that TIHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIHGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 7.00% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 23.66% | -11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 28.35% | -6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 21.88% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 21.32% | +0.67% |