PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMRGX vs. HTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMRGX achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -14.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AMRGX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 12.23%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


AMRGX

1D
1.75%
1M
7.84%
YTD
18.37%
6M
16.83%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
12.23%

HTGC

1D
-1.93%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-14.37%
6M
-14.09%
1Y
-4.30%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
18.37%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%13.37%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
-14.37%3.54%33.33%42.91%-10.42%26.50%14.49%39.86%-6.86%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AMRGX and HTGC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2005

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between AMRGX and HTGC has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMRGX vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMRGXHTGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

-0.19

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

-0.10

+2.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.99

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

-0.17

+3.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.90

-0.40

+7.30

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMRGX and HTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMRGXHTGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

-0.19

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.35

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.35

-0.23

Drawdowns

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMRGX drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, which is greater than HTGC's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMRGX and HTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMRGXHTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-68.21%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-24.74%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-27.97%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-36.11%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

-57.54%

+22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.03%

+19.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-10.86%

-29.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

10.72%

-5.06%

Volatility

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 5.23%. This indicates that AMRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMRGXHTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

5.23%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.98%

20.00%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

23.14%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.21%

25.72%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

27.84%

-6.34%

Dividends

AMRGX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

AMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.06%, more than HTGC's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.06%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
11.89%9.99%9.56%11.40%13.77%9.76%9.02%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMRGX and HTGC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to HTGC (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMRGX dropped -80.32% vs HTGC's -68.21%.

AMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMRGX and HTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer