PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TIER vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TIER vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIER is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TIER is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

TIER vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 16.51% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.27% return.

TIER

1D
0.15%
1M
4.35%
YTD
16.51%
6M
17.17%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.33%
1M
-5.79%
YTD
24.27%
6M
25.77%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIER vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TIER
T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF		16.51%12.72%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		24.27%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TIER and EINC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.06

TIER vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TIER
EINC

Technology

23.7%

-

Financial Services

23.6%

-

Industrials

13.7%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.3%

-

Healthcare

5.9%

-

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Energy

5.1%
99.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Utilities

2.5%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

TIER
23.7%
EINC

-

Financial Services

TIER
23.6%
EINC

-

Industrials

TIER
13.7%
EINC
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TIER
7.4%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

TIER
7.3%
EINC

-

Healthcare

TIER
5.9%
EINC

-

Communication Services

TIER
5.2%
EINC

-

Energy

TIER
5.1%
EINC
99.4%

Consumer Defensive

TIER
4.6%
EINC

-

Utilities

TIER
2.5%
EINC
0.6%

Real Estate

TIER
1.1%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with TIER:
TIER vs. TGRWTIER vs. FIDTIER vs. TOUSTIER vs. TSPATIER vs. CILTIER vs. TCHPTIER vs. TGRT
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

TIER vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TIER

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIER vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TIEREINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.82

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.47

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.32

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.47

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

8.82

—

TIER vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIER vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TIEREINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.07%

-87.55%

+75.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-7.89%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.01%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-19.87%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.79%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-44.16%

+42.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.09%

—

Volatility

TIER vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TIEREINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.32%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.86%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

15.07%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

19.54%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

25.43%

-9.18%

TIER vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIER vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than EINC's 3.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.56%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
TIER
T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF		0.64%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TIER and EINC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIER is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIER is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.64% for TIER.

TIER is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.45% for EINC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIER and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer