TIER vs. BILZ
TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TIER is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
TIER vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.66% return.
TIER
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIER vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 13.19% | 12.72% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.66% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIER and BILZ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIER vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
TIER
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILZ
TIER vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIER | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 47.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 197.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,895.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIER vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIER | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -0.52% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | 0.00% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -0.01% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
TIER vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIER | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 0.21% | +16.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 0.52% | +15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 0.52% | +15.97% |
TIER vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIER vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than BILZ's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.06% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% |
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIER and BILZ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TIER.
BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.66% for TIER.
TIER is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.14% for BILZ.
Find the right allocation for TIER and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer