TIBIX vs. LTMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX).
TIBIX is an actively managed fund by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 24, 2002. LTMFX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Sep 27, 1984.
Performance
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 9.82% | 37.01% | 13.48% | 18.28% | -7.69% | 20.36% | -0.40% | 18.01% | -4.31% | 15.23% |
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | -0.20% | 5.74% | 1.84% | 3.83% | -5.27% | -0.18% | 2.97% | 3.81% | 1.00% | 2.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIBIX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than LTMFX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBIX has outperformed LTMFX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while LTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.
TIBIX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
LTMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than LTMFX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TIBIX vs. LTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
TIBIX
LTMFX
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIBIX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.57 | 1.16 | +2.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 1.57 | +2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.43 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 1.52 | +2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.79 | 6.84 | +14.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIBIX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | 1.16 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | 0.49 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.61 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIBIX and LTMFX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Dividend Comparison
TIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than LTMFX's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.40% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | 3.25% | 4.28% | 3.60% | 2.11% | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.78% | 1.83% | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIBIX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than LTMFX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBIX and LTMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIBIX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.88% | -8.40% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -2.95% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.79% | -8.40% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | -8.40% | -26.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -1.81% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -1.64% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.65% | +1.10% |
Volatility
TIBIX vs. LTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) at 0.60%. This indicates that TIBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIBIX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 0.60% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 1.10% | +5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 3.29% | +7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 2.32% | +8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 2.26% | +11.22% |