LTMFX vs. TINGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX).
LTMFX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Sep 27, 1984. TINGX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Jan 31, 2007.
Performance
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | -0.28% | 5.74% | 1.84% | 3.83% | -5.27% | -0.18% | 2.97% | 3.81% | 1.00% | 2.29% |
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | -6.59% | 10.63% | 2.46% | 18.41% | -26.05% | -4.22% | 34.34% | 26.27% | -16.75% | 34.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTMFX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than TINGX's -6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LTMFX has underperformed TINGX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while TINGX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.28% annualized return.
LTMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
TINGX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTMFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than TINGX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTMFX vs. TINGX — Risk / Return Rank
LTMFX
TINGX
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTMFX | TINGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.20 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 0.39 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.05 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 0.20 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 0.64 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTMFX | TINGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.20 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | -0.10 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.31 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.33 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTMFX and TINGX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Dividend Comparison
LTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than TINGX's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | 3.25% | 4.28% | 3.60% | 2.11% | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.78% | 1.83% | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.56% |
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | 1.15% | 1.08% | 8.40% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 6.86% | 1.17% | 0.72% | 4.39% | 3.60% | 0.36% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTMFX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum TINGX drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTMFX and TINGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTMFX | TINGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -62.73% | +54.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -11.83% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.40% | -43.27% | +34.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.40% | -43.27% | +34.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -17.41% | +15.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -13.64% | +12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 3.78% | -3.14% |
Volatility
LTMFX vs. TINGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) is 0.58%, while Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that LTMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTMFX | TINGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 5.52% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 10.63% | -9.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 16.47% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.32% | 16.93% | -14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.26% | 16.96% | -14.70% |