PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THPMX vs. GTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THPMX achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than GTSGX's 7.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with THPMX having a 11.14% annualized return and GTSGX not far ahead at 11.29%.


THPMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.35%
6M
11.93%
YTD
15.89%
1Y
33.96%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
13.03%

GTSGX

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.13%
6M
3.41%
YTD
7.52%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
11.29%
ALL TIME*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THPMX
Thompson MidCap Fund
15.89%20.08%7.70%17.01%-14.84%29.71%11.97%33.48%-21.90%17.10%
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
7.52%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between THPMX and GTSGX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.88

The correlation between THPMX and GTSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THPMX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THPMX
THPMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
THPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
THPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THPMXGTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

0.88

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

2.09

+9.77

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THPMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THPMX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THPMX drawdown since its inception was -47.55%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THPMX and GTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THPMXGTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.55%

-73.82%

+26.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-11.99%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-19.63%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-21.94%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.55%

-38.25%

-9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-0.97%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-29.57%

+22.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

5.03%

-2.35%

Volatility

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) have volatilities of 3.97% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THPMXGTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.00%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

10.48%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

14.70%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

17.48%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.65%

18.07%

+4.58%

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THPMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

THPMX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

THPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than GTSGX's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.13%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
THPMX
Thompson MidCap Fund
8.18%9.48%8.04%7.60%12.04%9.76%0.33%2.93%7.29%7.51%4.84%9.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


THPMX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to THPMX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THPMX dropped -47.55% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

THPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THPMX and GTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer