PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THPMX vs. QCGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THPMX achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 16.91% return.


THPMX

1D
0.55%
1M
2.41%
YTD
12.56%
6M
11.55%
1Y
34.36%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
11.31%

QCGDX

1D
1.39%
1M
0.69%
YTD
16.91%
6M
16.47%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
THPMX
Thompson MidCap Fund
12.56%20.08%7.70%17.01%-14.84%29.71%11.97%0.16%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
16.91%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between THPMX and QCGDX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.75

The correlation between THPMX and QCGDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THPMX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THPMX
THPMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
THPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
THPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THPMXQCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.96

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

13.33

-0.76

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THPMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THPMX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THPMX drawdown since its inception was -47.55%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THPMX and QCGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THPMXQCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.55%

-22.37%

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-7.92%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-16.10%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-20.18%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.35%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-6.11%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.76%

+0.99%

Volatility

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thompson MidCap Fund (THPMX) is 4.62%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that THPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THPMXQCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

7.35%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

11.32%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

13.56%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

15.01%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.78%

16.62%

+6.16%

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THPMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

THPMX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

THPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.59%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THPMX
Thompson MidCap Fund
8.43%9.48%8.04%7.60%12.04%9.76%0.33%2.93%7.29%7.51%4.84%9.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


THPMX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to THPMX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THPMX dropped -47.55% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

THPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THPMX and QCGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer