THNQ vs. XLK
THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, THNQ returned 17.90%/yr vs 23.83%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
THNQ vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 44.05% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 36.47% return.
THNQ
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 22.90%
- YTD
- 44.05%
- 6M
- 40.99%
- 1Y
- 79.25%
- 3Y*
- 37.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
THNQ vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 44.05% | 29.83% | 18.82% | 56.81% | -39.84% | 9.10% | 58.41% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 37.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNQ and XLK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between THNQ and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
THNQ vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THNQ
XLK
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
THNQ
XLK
Communication Services
THNQ
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
THNQ
XLK
-
Healthcare
THNQ
XLK
-
Financial Services
THNQ
XLK
-
Industrials
THNQ
XLK
Real Estate
THNQ
XLK
-
Basic Materials
THNQ
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
THNQ
-
XLK
-
Energy
THNQ
-
XLK
Utilities
THNQ
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNQ vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
THNQ
XLK
THNQ vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THNQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 4.22 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 14.16 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THNQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 3.24 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.96 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.42 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
THNQ vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -82.05% | +31.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.39% | -15.92% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.88% | -25.66% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | -33.56% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -1.00% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.07% | -34.96% | +19.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 4.74% | +0.82% |
Volatility
THNQ vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 6.98% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | 16.68% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 20.82% | +5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 24.90% | +4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 24.49% | +4.17% |
THNQ vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNQ vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THNQ and XLK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THNQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 17.90% for THNQ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.
THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THNQ and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer