PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNQ vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 44.05% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 36.47% return.


THNQ

1D
-2.20%
1M
22.90%
YTD
44.05%
6M
40.99%
1Y
79.25%
3Y*
37.91%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNQ vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
44.05%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%58.41%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%37.27%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and XLK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.85

The correlation between THNQ and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THNQ
XLK

Technology

71.6%
99.7%

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%

-

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Industrials

1.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

THNQ
71.6%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

THNQ
10.3%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

THNQ
9.2%
XLK

-

Healthcare

THNQ
5.6%
XLK

-

Financial Services

THNQ
1.3%
XLK

-

Industrials

THNQ
1.1%
XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

THNQ
0.9%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

THNQ

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

THNQ

-

XLK

-

Energy

THNQ

-

XLK
0.2%

Utilities

THNQ

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNQXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

4.22

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

14.16

+0.15

THNQ vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNQXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

3.24

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.96

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.42

+0.41

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-82.05%

+31.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-15.92%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.88%

-25.66%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-33.56%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.00%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.07%

-34.96%

+19.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

4.74%

+0.82%

Volatility

THNQ vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNQXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

6.98%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

16.68%

+4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

20.82%

+5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

24.90%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

24.49%

+4.17%

THNQ vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNQ vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.14%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNQ and XLK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 17.90% for THNQ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.

THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNQ and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer