THNQ vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. THNQ is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, THNQ returned 65.89% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

THNQ vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 40.68% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.

THNQ

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 36.61%
• YTD: 40.68%
• 1Y: 65.89%
• 3Y*: 35.16%
• 5Y*: 15.81%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNQ vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	40.68%	35.45%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and WNTR is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

THNQ vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 79
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THNQ	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.06	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.34	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	2.60	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	6.69	+4.12

THNQ vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNQ	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-42.65%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-42.65%	+24.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-11.84%	+7.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.92%	-20.57%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	16.58%	-10.64%

Volatility

THNQ vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is 10.89%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that THNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THNQ	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.89%	18.80%	-7.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.85%	47.57%	-23.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.08%	53.81%	-24.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.63%	53.62%	-23.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.92%	53.62%	-24.70%

THNQ vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

THNQ vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNQ and WNTR in my portfolio?

THNQ and WNTR have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THNQ or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to THNQ (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, THNQ or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 65.89% for THNQ. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THNQ or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 65.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNQ or WNTR?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNQ or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between THNQ and WNTR?

THNQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.