THNQ vs. TRUT
THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. THNQ is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
THNQ vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 44.05% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
THNQ
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 22.90%
- YTD
- 44.05%
- 6M
- 40.99%
- 1Y
- 79.25%
- 3Y*
- 37.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.90%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THNQ vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 44.05% | 13.65% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNQ and TRUT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNQ vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
THNQ
TRUT
THNQ vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THNQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THNQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 2.39 | -1.56 |
Drawdowns
THNQ vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -18.55% | -32.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -1.46% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.07% | -5.17% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | — | — |
Volatility
THNQ vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNQ | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 21.53% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 21.53% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 21.53% | +7.13% |
THNQ vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNQ vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.14% | 0.20% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THNQ and TRUT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for THNQ and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer