THNQ vs. IGPT
THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index while IGPT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, THNQ returned 14.49%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for IGPT. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IGPT.
Performance
THNQ vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly lower than IGPT's 45.80% return.
THNQ
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 31.35%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 1Y
- 55.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.75%
IGPT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- 6M
- 33.98%
- YTD
- 45.80%
- 1Y
- 74.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 19.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.12M | $21.89M | $21.69M | |
| $1.82M | $1.71M | $2.47M |
THNQ vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 33.15% | 29.83% | 18.82% | 56.81% | -39.84% | 9.10% | 60.92% |
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 45.80% | 31.55% | 17.15% | 27.29% | -27.73% | -11.79% | 46.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between THNQ and IGPT is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between THNQ and IGPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
THNQ vs. IGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THNQ
IGPT
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
THNQ
IGPT
Consumer Cyclical
THNQ
IGPT
Communication Services
THNQ
IGPT
Healthcare
THNQ
IGPT
Industrials
THNQ
IGPT
Real Estate
THNQ
IGPT
Financial Services
THNQ
IGPT
Basic Materials
THNQ
-
IGPT
-
Consumer Defensive
THNQ
-
IGPT
-
Energy
THNQ
-
IGPT
-
Utilities
THNQ
-
IGPT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THNQ vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank
THNQ
IGPT
THNQ vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THNQ | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.89 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | 11.04 | -3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THNQ vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, roughly equal to the maximum IGPT drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and IGPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THNQ | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -50.14% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.39% | -24.74% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.88% | -29.30% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.56% | -42.04% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.60% | -19.79% | +10.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -11.95% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 6.47% | -0.02% |
Volatility
THNQ vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is 9.75%, while Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that THNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THNQ | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.75% | 14.66% | -4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.75% | 32.84% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.08% | 36.85% | -6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 29.53% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 27.29% | +1.68% |
THNQ vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IGPT's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
THNQ vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison
THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than IGPT's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THNQ and IGPT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGPT has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to THNQ (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs IGPT's -50.14%.
On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 14.49% vs 12.06% for IGPT. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.
THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.56% for IGPT.
IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THNQ and IGPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer