PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNQ vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 44.05% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return.


THNQ

1D
-2.20%
1M
22.90%
YTD
44.05%
6M
40.99%
1Y
79.25%
3Y*
37.91%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*

IDGT

1D
-1.58%
1M
8.43%
YTD
53.90%
6M
49.82%
1Y
63.37%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNQ vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
44.05%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%58.41%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
53.90%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%19.78%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and IDGT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.70

The correlation between THNQ and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THNQ
IDGT

Technology

71.6%
60.7%

Communication Services

10.3%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%

-

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Industrials

1.1%

-

Real Estate

0.9%
34.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

THNQ
71.6%
IDGT
60.7%

Communication Services

THNQ
10.3%
IDGT
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

THNQ
9.2%
IDGT

-

Healthcare

THNQ
5.6%
IDGT

-

Financial Services

THNQ
1.3%
IDGT

-

Industrials

THNQ
1.1%
IDGT

-

Real Estate

THNQ
0.9%
IDGT
34.3%

Basic Materials

THNQ

-

IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

THNQ

-

IDGT

-

Energy

THNQ

-

IDGT

-

Utilities

THNQ

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNQIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

7.54

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

22.58

-8.28

THNQ vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNQIDGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

3.13

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.58

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.18

+0.65

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-77.95%

+27.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-8.45%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.88%

-23.74%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-35.83%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.58%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.07%

-19.91%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

2.81%

+2.75%

Volatility

THNQ vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.87%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNQIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

7.87%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

16.35%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

20.41%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

23.20%

+5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

23.29%

+5.37%

THNQ vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNQ vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than IDGT's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.14%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNQ and IDGT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THNQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to IDGT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 17.90% vs 13.30% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.

THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNQ and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer