THNQ vs. FBOT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. THNQ is passively managed, while FBOT is actively managed. Over the past year, THNQ returned 79.25% vs 39.88% for FBOT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FBOT.

Performance

THNQ vs. FBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 44.05% return, which is significantly higher than FBOT's 20.06% return.

THNQ

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: 22.90%
• YTD: 44.05%
• 6M: 40.99%
• 1Y: 79.25%
• 3Y*: 37.91%
• 5Y*: 17.90%
• 10Y*: —

FBOT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 20.06%
• 6M: 21.90%
• 1Y: 39.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNQ vs. FBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	44.05%	29.83%	18.82%	15.10%
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	20.06%	19.15%	12.58%	-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and FBOT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.84

The correlation between THNQ and FBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. FBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THNQ	FBOT
Technology	71.6%	37.5%
Communication Services	10.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	6.3%
Healthcare	5.6%	0.9%
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Industrials	1.1%	51.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

THNQ vs. FBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 80
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. FBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THNQ	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	1.98	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.70	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.34	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	2.64	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.31	10.50	+3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THNQ vs. FBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the FBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and FBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THNQ	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	1.98	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.81	+0.01

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. FBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than FBOT's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and FBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNQ	FBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-23.61%	-26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-15.17%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-0.34%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.07%	-5.15%	-9.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	3.81%	+1.75%

Volatility

THNQ vs. FBOT - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) at 5.59%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THNQ	FBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	5.59%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.69%	16.00%	+4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	20.25%	+6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.09%	20.95%	+8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.66%	20.95%	+7.71%

THNQ vs. FBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FBOT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

THNQ vs. FBOT - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FBOT's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.59%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.14%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNQ and FBOT in my portfolio?

THNQ and FBOT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THNQ or FBOT?

THNQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FBOT (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs FBOT's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, THNQ or FBOT?

On 1-year performance, THNQ leads with 79.25% vs 39.88% for FBOT. On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FBOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THNQ or FBOT?

Over the 1-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 79.25% return vs 39.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNQ or FBOT?

FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNQ or FBOT?

FBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.14% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between THNQ and FBOT?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.50% for FBOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.