FBOT vs. KOID

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FBOT is actively managed, while KOID is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBOT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KOID.

Performance

FBOT vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 32.82% return.

FBOT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 20.55%
• 6M: 21.15%
• 1Y: 39.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KOID

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 11.58%
• YTD: 32.82%
• 6M: 37.72%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBOT vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	20.55%	16.03%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	32.82%	26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FBOT and KOID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.77

FBOT vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBOT	KOID
Industrials	51.0%	35.5%
Technology	37.5%	42.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	15.8%
Communication Services	4.2%	-
Healthcare	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FBOT vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBOT vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBOT	KOID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBOT	KOID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	2.83	-2.01

Drawdowns

FBOT vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and KOID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBOT	KOID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-18.19%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.22%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-3.35%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBOT	KOID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	24.53%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	24.53%	-3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	24.53%	-3.59%

FBOT vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBOT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBOT vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than KOID's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.58%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.64%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBOT and KOID in my portfolio?

FBOT and KOID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBOT or KOID?

On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBOT or KOID?

FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KOID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBOT or KOID?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.58% for FBOT.

What is the main difference between FBOT and KOID?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FBOT and 0.69% for KOID.