PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. AIFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

THNQ vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

THNQ vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-6.16%29.83%12.72%
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
2.61%28.30%14.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 2.61% return.


THNQ

1D
0.96%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-6.16%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

AIFD

1D
5.59%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
2.61%
6M
9.21%
1Y
61.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


THNQ vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AIFD
AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THNQAIFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

2.00

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.63

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.28

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

17.36

-11.20

THNQ vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and AIFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THNQAIFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.00

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and AIFD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

THNQ vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

THNQ vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than AIFD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and AIFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQAIFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-33.20%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-13.98%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-4.64%

-8.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-6.17%

-9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

3.45%

+2.21%

Volatility

THNQ vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) have volatilities of 10.64% and 10.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


THNQAIFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

10.86%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

20.22%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.42%

30.77%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

29.32%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

29.32%

-0.75%