PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THMAX vs. LUBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THMAX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than LUBIX's -1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, THMAX has outperformed LUBIX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while LUBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.30% annualized return.


THMAX

1D
0.46%
1M
0.06%
6M
4.66%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
8.24%
ALL TIME*
6.14%

LUBIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.89%
6M
-1.40%
YTD
-1.24%
1Y
1.11%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
2.30%
ALL TIME*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THMAX
Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund
6.31%13.27%18.33%15.69%-16.43%11.95%13.29%18.35%-4.94%9.24%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
-1.24%7.57%2.93%8.11%-16.07%-0.76%11.61%13.20%-2.60%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between THMAX and LUBIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.06

Over the past year, THMAX and LUBIX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THMAX vs. LUBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THMAX
THMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
THMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBIX
LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THMAXLUBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

0.58

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

1.62

+7.61

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the LUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THMAX and LUBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMAX drawdown since its inception was -41.95%, which is greater than LUBIX's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMAX and LUBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THMAXLUBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.95%

-23.52%

-18.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-3.22%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.85%

-5.59%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-22.12%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

-22.12%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-2.67%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-3.78%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.14%

+0.28%

Volatility

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) at 1.05%. This indicates that THMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THMAXLUBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.05%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

3.24%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

4.11%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

6.40%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

5.64%

+5.10%

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

THMAX vs. LUBIX - Dividend Comparison

THMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than LUBIX's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
4.04%4.20%4.13%3.06%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%2.99%3.16%3.40%
THMAX
Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund
6.77%7.15%12.28%2.96%1.39%6.31%4.00%5.24%4.38%1.40%1.29%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


THMAX and LUBIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THMAX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to LUBIX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMAX dropped -41.95% vs LUBIX's -23.52%.

THMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THMAX and LUBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer