PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUBIX vs. TAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund (TAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUBIX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than TAAAX's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LUBIX has underperformed TAAAX with an annualized return of 2.70%, while TAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


LUBIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.70%

TAAAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.12%
YTD
10.35%
6M
11.14%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
0.46%7.57%2.93%8.11%-16.07%-0.76%11.61%13.20%-2.60%5.69%
TAAAX
Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.35%15.18%23.46%18.79%-18.19%19.56%16.42%24.52%-6.90%14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LUBIX and TAAAX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

-0.05

The correlation between LUBIX and TAAAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUBIX vs. TAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUBIX
LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TAAAX
TAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund (TAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUBIXTAAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

2.22

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

3.08

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.00

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.39

13.30

-6.91

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the TAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUBIX and TAAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUBIXTAAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.22

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.62

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.70

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.40

+0.25

Drawdowns

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum TAAAX drawdown of -56.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBIX and TAAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUBIXTAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-56.23%

+32.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-8.63%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-17.38%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-29.84%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.12%

-33.33%

+11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-9.76%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.95%

-0.99%

Volatility

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) is 1.46%, while Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund (TAAAX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that LUBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUBIXTAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

3.12%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

9.09%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

11.75%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

16.79%

-10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

16.75%

-11.12%

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUBIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAAX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

LUBIX vs. TAAAX - Dividend Comparison

LUBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than TAAAX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
4.30%4.20%4.13%3.06%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%2.99%3.16%3.40%
TAAAX
Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund
6.93%7.64%15.10%3.64%2.40%10.30%3.01%6.32%9.31%0.39%0.52%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUBIX and TAAAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAAAX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to LUBIX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUBIX dropped -23.52% vs TAAAX's -56.23%.

TAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUBIX and TAAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer