LUBIX vs. AAAGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LUBIX (Thrivent Income Fund) and AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LUBIX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Thrivent, while AAAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, LUBIX returned 2.68%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for AAAGX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. LUBIX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for AAAGX.

Performance

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUBIX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than AAAGX's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LUBIX has underperformed AAAGX with an annualized return of 2.68%, while AAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.

LUBIX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: 5.18%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

AAAGX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 25.99%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUBIX Thrivent Income Fund	0.22%	7.57%	2.93%	8.11%	-16.07%	-0.76%	11.61%	13.20%	-2.60%	5.69%
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	5.37%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	1.43%	24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LUBIX and AAAGX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1999	-0.08

The correlation between LUBIX and AAAGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LUBIX vs. AAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUBIX

LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 20
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LUBIX	AAAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.97	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	1.35	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	4.50	+1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the AAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUBIX and AAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LUBIX	AAAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.59	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.79	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.33	+0.32

Drawdowns

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum AAAGX drawdown of -64.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBIX and AAAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUBIX	AAAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-64.98%	+41.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.22%	-16.76%	+13.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.35%	-23.44%	+17.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.12%	-40.41%	+18.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.12%	-40.41%	+18.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-1.02%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-23.87%	+20.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	5.01%	-4.04%

Volatility

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) is 1.44%, while Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that LUBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUBIX	AAAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	3.93%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	12.21%	-9.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22%	16.00%	-11.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	22.74%	-16.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.63%	21.71%	-16.08%

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUBIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAGX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LUBIX vs. AAAGX - Dividend Comparison

LUBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AAAGX's 3.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.57%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%	0.00%
LUBIX Thrivent Income Fund	4.31%	4.20%	4.13%	3.06%	3.30%	4.18%	5.21%	3.42%	3.44%	2.99%	3.16%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUBIX and AAAGX in my portfolio?

LUBIX and AAAGX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LUBIX or AAAGX?

AAAGX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to LUBIX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUBIX dropped -23.52% vs AAAGX's -64.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.