PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THLV vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 4.36% return.


THLV

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.87%
6M
2.97%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
14.95%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

MOAT

1D
0.23%
1M
1.68%
6M
3.18%
YTD
4.36%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.74M$67.48M$82.03M
$336.07K$335.31K$358.63K

THLV vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
8.51%10.50%9.52%5.88%1.22%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
4.36%13.20%10.73%31.89%-5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and MOAT is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022

0.76

The correlation between THLV and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THLV vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THLV
MOAT

Energy

17.5%

-

Technology

17.5%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
11.1%

Real Estate

14.0%
0.7%

Utilities

14.0%

-

Financial Services

13.8%
9.2%

Industrials

13.8%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
18.2%

Healthcare

12.5%
18.1%

Basic Materials

11.3%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
2.4%

Energy

THLV
17.5%
MOAT

-

Technology

THLV
17.5%
MOAT
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

THLV
15.5%
MOAT
11.1%

Real Estate

THLV
14.0%
MOAT
0.7%

Utilities

THLV
14.0%
MOAT

-

Financial Services

THLV
13.8%
MOAT
9.2%

Industrials

THLV
13.8%
MOAT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

THLV
13.7%
MOAT
18.2%

Healthcare

THLV
12.5%
MOAT
18.1%

Basic Materials

THLV
11.3%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

THLV
0.1%
MOAT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THLV vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THLVMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.06

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

3.17

+3.06

THLV vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THLV vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-33.31%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-12.43%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-21.44%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.06%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-3.82%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

4.16%

-1.92%

Volatility

THLV vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 2.84%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLVMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

4.00%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

10.47%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

14.04%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

18.29%

-6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.74%

18.62%

-6.88%

THLV vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

THLV vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than MOAT's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.30%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.63%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and MOAT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to THLV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 3-year performance, MOAT leads with 10.60% vs 9.68% for THLV. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.30% for MOAT.

THLV is categorized as Equal Weight, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.47% for MOAT.

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer