TGT vs. CINF
TGT (Target Corporation) and CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) are both stocks. TGT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while CINF operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TGT returned 9.45%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for CINF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGT vs. CINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 29.32% return, which is significantly higher than CINF's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has underperformed CINF with an annualized return of 9.45%, while CINF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.63% annualized return.
TGT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 6M
- 35.84%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- -9.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
CINF
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
TGT vs. CINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 29.32% | -24.50% | -2.27% | -1.35% | -34.24% | 32.91% | 40.47% | 100.17% | 4.67% | -5.84% |
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | -0.07% | 16.27% | 42.48% | 4.00% | -7.89% | 33.28% | -14.15% | 38.87% | 6.25% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGT and CINF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.31 |
The correlation between TGT and CINF shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGT:
$7.93
CINF:
$23.30
TGT:
15.63
CINF:
6.96
TGT:
0.54
CINF:
1.49
TGT:
$105.47B
CINF:
$12.92B
TGT:
$27.05B
CINF:
$5.39B
TGT:
$8.20B
CINF:
$3.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGT vs. CINF — Risk / Return Rank
TGT
CINF
TGT vs. CINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGT | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 0.95 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 2.47 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGT | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.50 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.34 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.41 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.42 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
TGT vs. CINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, which is greater than CINF's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and CINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGT | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -59.64% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.27% | -10.46% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.78% | -20.03% | -29.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.40% | -35.77% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.40% | -58.12% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.22% | -5.47% | -40.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -12.19% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 4.07% | +4.57% |
Volatility
TGT vs. CINF - Volatility Comparison
Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) at 5.78%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGT | CINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.18% | 5.78% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.05% | 13.67% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.12% | 19.78% | +10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 25.69% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.26% | 28.82% | +4.44% |
Dividends
TGT vs. CINF - Dividend Comparison
TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CINF's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 2.19% | 2.13% | 2.25% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.13% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.53% | 3.89% |
TGT Target Corporation | 3.68% | 4.62% | 3.28% | 3.06% | 2.66% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 3.81% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 2.97% |
Financials
TGT vs. CINF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Corporation and Cincinnati Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGT vs. CINF - Profitability Comparison
TGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 24.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.
CINF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
CINF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 942.00M and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
CINF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cincinnati Financial Corporation reported a net income of 274.00M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGT and CINF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGT has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to CINF (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs CINF's -59.64%.
TGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGT and CINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer