PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRW vs. TAGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRW vs. TAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than TAGG's 0.44% return.


TGRW

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
0.74%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
15.30%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*

TAGG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRW vs. TAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.74%15.62%29.94%48.87%-38.42%3.25%
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
0.44%7.40%1.73%5.72%-12.63%-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRW and TAGG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRW vs. TAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

TAGG
TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRW vs. TAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGRWTAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.45

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

3.99

-1.46

TGRW vs. TAGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the TAGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRW and TAGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGRW vs. TAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, which is greater than TAGG's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and TAGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRWTAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-17.26%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-3.19%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

-6.40%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-1.78%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-6.81%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

1.15%

+4.90%

Volatility

TGRW vs. TAGG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) at 0.97%. This indicates that TGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRWTAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.40%

0.97%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

2.75%

+10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

3.70%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.40%

6.50%

+16.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.04%

6.50%

+16.54%

TGRW vs. TAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGG's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRW vs. TAGG - Dividend Comparison

TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
4.57%4.36%4.36%3.48%3.67%0.33%0.00%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRW and TAGG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGRW has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to TAGG (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs TAGG's -17.26%.

On 3-year performance, TGRW leads with 19.72% vs 4.00% for TAGG. On fees, TAGG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TAGG has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TGRW has performed better with a 19.72% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAGG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

TAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TAGG is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.08% for TAGG.

TAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRW and TAGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer