TGRT vs. TFNS
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TFNS is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TFNS.
Performance
TGRT vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than TFNS's -5.36% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFNS
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRT vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 5.49% | 13.52% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -5.36% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and TFNS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.47 |
TGRT vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRT
TFNS
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
TGRT
TFNS
Communication Services
TGRT
TFNS
-
Consumer Cyclical
TGRT
TFNS
-
Healthcare
TGRT
TFNS
-
Financial Services
TGRT
TFNS
Industrials
TGRT
TFNS
Consumer Defensive
TGRT
TFNS
-
Utilities
TGRT
TFNS
-
Basic Materials
TGRT
TFNS
-
Energy
TGRT
TFNS
-
Real Estate
TGRT
-
TFNS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. TFNS — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
TFNS
TGRT vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRT | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRT | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.31 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and TFNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -14.00% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -8.00% | +6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -3.82% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | — | — |
Volatility
TGRT vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 15.04% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 15.04% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 15.04% | +4.05% |
TGRT vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TFNS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.52% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGRT and TFNS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
TFNS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.07% for TGRT.
TGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TFNS is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.44% for TFNS.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and TFNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer