PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLS vs. AEHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TGLS vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLS achieves a -15.56% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 373.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TGLS has underperformed AEHR with an annualized return of 17.38%, while AEHR has yielded a comparatively higher 49.80% annualized return.


TGLS

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.41%
YTD
-15.56%
6M
-16.64%
1Y
-51.61%
3Y*
0.23%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
17.38%

AEHR

1D
-2.92%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
373.40%
6M
300.42%
1Y
742.86%
3Y*
30.98%
5Y*
104.84%
10Y*
49.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLS vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
-15.56%-35.98%74.88%49.86%18.91%281.83%-14.53%10.03%15.12%-36.04%
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
373.40%21.41%-37.32%31.99%-16.87%855.73%26.50%41.84%-47.97%12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLS and AEHR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.18

The correlation between TGLS and AEHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGLS:

$1.89B

AEHR:

$2.93B

EPS

TGLS:

$3.24

AEHR:

-$0.38

PS Ratio

TGLS:

1.93

AEHR:

63.83

PB Ratio

TGLS:

2.57

AEHR:

21.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGLS:

$1.01B

AEHR:

$45.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGLS:

$419.72M

AEHR:

$13.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

TGLS:

$251.16M

AEHR:

-$13.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLS vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLS
TGLS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AEHR
AEHR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AEHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AEHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLS vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGLSAEHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.50

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

17.73

-18.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

40.02

-41.39

TGLS vs. AEHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLS Sharpe Ratio is -1.32, which is lower than the AEHR Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLS and AEHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGLSAEHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.32

6.34

-7.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.96

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.53

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.08

+0.20

Drawdowns

TGLS vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, smaller than the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLS and AEHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLSAEHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.32%

-97.98%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.42%

-42.31%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.55%

-87.37%

+30.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.55%

-87.37%

+30.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.98%

-87.37%

+9.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.61%

-18.01%

-33.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-79.64%

+56.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.03%

18.70%

+19.33%

Volatility

TGLS vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) is 14.40%, while Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a volatility of 41.80%. This indicates that TGLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLSAEHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

41.80%

-27.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.72%

87.81%

-58.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.17%

118.61%

-79.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.88%

109.78%

-55.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.26%

93.87%

-39.61%

Dividends

TGLS vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison

TGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
1.42%1.19%0.61%0.79%0.91%0.56%1.59%6.79%5.20%7.21%2.04%

Financials

TGLS vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tecnoglass Inc. and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
249.01M
10.31M
(TGLS) Total Revenue
(AEHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TGLS vs. AEHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tecnoglass Inc. and Aehr Test Systems over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
38.5%
32.7%
Portfolio components
TGLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a gross profit of 95.83M and revenue of 249.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

AEHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 3.37M and revenue of 10.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

TGLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

AEHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -4.23M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.0%.

TGLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a net income of 31.89M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

AEHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of -3.20M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in a net margin of -31.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TGLS and AEHR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEHR has higher volatility (41.80%) compared to TGLS (14.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLS dropped -81.32% vs AEHR's -97.98%.

AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLS and AEHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer