PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLR vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 15.18% return.


TGLR

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.45%
YTD
12.16%
6M
11.12%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
-1.20%
1M
2.78%
YTD
15.18%
6M
14.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLR vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and LVDS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.77

TGLR vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGLR
LVDS

Technology

24.6%
18.7%

Financial Services

15.2%
18.7%

Industrials

15.0%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
10.1%

Energy

7.6%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.7%

Utilities

2.1%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
4.1%

Technology

TGLR
24.6%
LVDS
18.7%

Financial Services

TGLR
15.2%
LVDS
18.7%

Industrials

TGLR
15.0%
LVDS
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TGLR
13.1%
LVDS
8.4%

Healthcare

TGLR
8.8%
LVDS
10.1%

Energy

TGLR
7.6%
LVDS
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

TGLR
4.7%
LVDS
6.4%

Communication Services

TGLR
3.7%
LVDS
7.5%

Basic Materials

TGLR
3.0%
LVDS
2.7%

Utilities

TGLR
2.1%
LVDS
4.7%

Real Estate

TGLR
2.1%
LVDS
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LVDS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLR vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGLRLVDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

TGLR vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-6.64%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.20%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-0.95%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

TGLR vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLRLVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.68%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

10.68%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

10.68%

+4.60%

TGLR vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLR vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than LVDS's 7.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
7.45%8.25%0.00%0.00%
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
0.88%1.16%1.02%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLR and LVDS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.88% for TGLR.

They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLR and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer