PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. JHDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLR vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 17.56% return.


TGLR

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.45%
YTD
12.16%
6M
11.12%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JHDV

1D
-1.41%
1M
1.19%
YTD
17.56%
6M
16.88%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLR vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
12.16%23.30%18.71%4.88%
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
17.56%14.76%20.25%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and JHDV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023

0.90

The correlation between TGLR and JHDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JHDV
JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLR vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGLRJHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.65

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

14.91

-0.18

TGLR vs. JHDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the JHDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and JHDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, roughly equal to the maximum JHDV drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and JHDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRJHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-18.97%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-8.26%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-2.03%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-2.61%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.02%

+0.01%

Volatility

TGLR vs. JHDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) is 3.93%, while John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLRJHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.43%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

9.60%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

12.20%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

15.71%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

15.71%

-0.43%

TGLR vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLR vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than JHDV's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
2.01%2.40%2.50%2.77%0.85%
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
0.88%1.16%1.02%0.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLR and JHDV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHDV has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to TGLR (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs JHDV's -18.97%.

On 1-year performance, JHDV leads with 30.01% vs 29.89% for TGLR. On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 29.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

JHDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.88% for TGLR.

They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.34% for JHDV.

JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLR and JHDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer