TGLR vs. JHDV
TGLR (LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF) and JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 29.89% vs 30.01% for JHDV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for JHDV.
Performance
TGLR vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 17.56% return.
TGLR
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHDV
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGLR vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 12.16% | 23.30% | 18.71% | 4.88% |
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 17.56% | 14.76% | 20.25% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLR and JHDV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TGLR and JHDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLR vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank
TGLR
JHDV
TGLR vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLR | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.65 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.73 | 14.91 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLR vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, roughly equal to the maximum JHDV drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and JHDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLR | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -18.97% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -8.26% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -2.03% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -2.61% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.02% | +0.01% |
Volatility
TGLR vs. JHDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) is 3.93%, while John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLR | JHDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.43% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 9.60% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 12.20% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 15.71% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 15.71% | -0.43% |
TGLR vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLR vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison
TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than JHDV's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | 2.01% | 2.40% | 2.50% | 2.77% | 0.85% |
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 0.88% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLR and JHDV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHDV has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to TGLR (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs JHDV's -18.97%.
On 1-year performance, JHDV leads with 30.01% vs 29.89% for TGLR. On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 29.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.
JHDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.88% for TGLR.
They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.34% for JHDV.
JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGLR and JHDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer