TGLR vs. ELCV
TGLR (LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 34.03% vs 30.91% for ELCV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ELCV.
Performance
TGLR vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.38% return.
TGLR
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGLR vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 13.10% | 23.30% | 0.46% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 21.38% | 9.96% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLR and ELCV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between TGLR and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLR vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank
TGLR
ELCV
TGLR vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGLR | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 6.15 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | 21.81 | -4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGLR | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.71 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
TGLR vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than ELCV's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and ELCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLR | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -18.38% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -5.05% | -3.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | 0.00% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -3.75% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.43% | +0.57% |
Volatility
TGLR vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLR | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.61% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 8.75% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 11.47% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 15.38% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 15.38% | -0.09% |
TGLR vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLR vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison
TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than ELCV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.76% | 2.34% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
TGLR LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF | 0.88% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLR and ELCV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGLR has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to ELCV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs ELCV's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 34.03% vs 30.91% for ELCV. On fees, ELCV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 34.03% return vs 30.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ELCV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.
ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.88% for TGLR.
They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGLR and ELCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer