PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. ELCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLR vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 19.43% return.


TGLR

1D
1.01%
1M
1.21%
6M
7.68%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.26%

ELCV

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.24%
6M
12.56%
YTD
19.43%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.68M$1.35M$1.57M
$127.00K$118.29K$218.46K

TGLR vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TGLR
Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF
13.03%23.30%-0.02%
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
19.43%9.96%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and ELCV is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.72

The correlation between TGLR and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ELCV
ELCV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ELCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ELCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGLR vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGLRELCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.78

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.79

14.14

-2.35

TGLR vs. ELCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ELCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and ELCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than ELCV's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and ELCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRELCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-18.38%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-6.54%

-2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-4.68%

+3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-3.59%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.74%

+0.42%

Volatility

TGLR vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is 3.67%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLRELCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.96%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

9.89%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

12.75%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

15.45%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

15.45%

-0.28%

TGLR vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLR vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ELCV's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
2.15%2.34%0.29%0.00%
TGLR
Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF
0.93%1.16%1.02%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLR and ELCV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELCV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TGLR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs ELCV's -18.38%.

On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 25.36% vs 24.60% for ELCV. On fees, ELCV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 25.36% return vs 24.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ELCV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.93% for TGLR.

TGLR is categorized as Dividend, while ELCV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.49% for ELCV.

ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLR and ELCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer