TGLB vs. TGRW
TGLB (T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGLB is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past year, TGLB returned 13.13% vs 11.22% for TGRW. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGLB charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.
Performance
TGLB vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLB achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's -0.85% return.
TGLB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRW
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 11.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TGLB vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 8.78% | 3.99% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | -0.85% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLB and TGRW is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.84 |
TGLB vs. TGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGLB
TGRW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGLB
TGRW
Financial Services
TGLB
TGRW
Communication Services
TGLB
TGRW
Industrials
TGLB
TGRW
Healthcare
TGLB
TGRW
Consumer Cyclical
TGLB
TGRW
Basic Materials
TGLB
TGRW
Utilities
TGLB
TGRW
-
Energy
TGLB
TGRW
-
Consumer Defensive
TGLB
TGRW
Real Estate
TGLB
-
TGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLB vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank
TGLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TGRW
TGLB vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLB | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLB vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and TGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLB | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -43.33% | +33.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -18.84% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -7.98% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -12.40% | +10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.09% | — |
Volatility
TGLB vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLB | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 17.35% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 23.40% | -9.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 23.03% | -8.82% |
TGLB vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLB vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison
TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLB and TGRW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, TGLB leads with 13.13% vs 11.22% for TGRW. On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TGLB has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
TGLB has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
TGLB is categorized as Global Equities, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.52% for TGRW.
Find the right allocation for TGLB and TGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer