TGGBX vs. TNBMX
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX).
TGGBX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. TNBMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017.
Performance
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | -0.84% | 10.17% | -2.27% | 7.01% | -17.09% | -4.71% | 12.29% | 8.36% | -1.75% | 0.15% |
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 0.16% | 6.87% | 3.84% | 10.32% | -12.30% | -1.63% | 5.73% | 10.77% | 1.72% | 1.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGGBX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than TNBMX's 0.16% return.
TGGBX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
TNBMX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGGBX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TNBMX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TGGBX vs. TNBMX — Risk / Return Rank
TGGBX
TNBMX
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGGBX | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 2.40 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 3.71 | -2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.57 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.84 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 12.29 | -7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGGBX | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.40 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | 0.41 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.87 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between TGGBX and TNBMX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Dividend Comparison
TGGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than TNBMX's 6.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGGBX TCW Global Bond Fund | 3.94% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.93% | 3.70% | 4.18% | 0.50% | 1.88% | 2.91% | 2.25% |
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 6.68% | 6.29% | 3.15% | 2.85% | 10.20% | 2.84% | 1.90% | 4.65% | 8.20% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGGBX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, which is greater than TNBMX's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGBX and TNBMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGGBX | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -15.78% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | -2.32% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.20% | -15.48% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -1.74% | -8.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -3.16% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 0.54% | +0.64% |
Volatility
TGGBX vs. TNBMX - Volatility Comparison
TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) at 1.17%. This indicates that TGGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TGGBX | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 1.17% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 1.82% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.44% | 2.71% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 3.61% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 3.33% | +2.42% |