PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGGBX vs. TGEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGGBX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than TGEIX's 4.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TGGBX has underperformed TGEIX with an annualized return of 0.83%, while TGEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.69% annualized return.


TGGBX

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-1.76%
YTD
-0.72%
1Y
1.14%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
0.83%
ALL TIME*
1.47%

TGEIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.71%
6M
2.25%
YTD
4.10%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
2.62%
10Y*
3.69%
ALL TIME*
5.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
-0.72%10.17%-2.27%7.01%-17.09%-4.71%12.29%8.36%-1.75%6.02%
TGEIX
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund
4.10%14.59%7.33%12.10%-17.54%-5.07%5.13%15.86%-6.16%11.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TGGBX and TGEIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.43

The correlation between TGGBX and TGEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGGBX vs. TGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGGBX
TGGBX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TGGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TGGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TGEIX
TGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) and TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGGBXTGEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.54

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.45

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

10.91

-9.91

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGGBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the TGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGGBX and TGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGGBX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum TGEIX drawdown of -46.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGGBX and TGEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGGBXTGEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

-46.33%

+18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.17%

-4.56%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.55%

-5.62%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.13%

-29.53%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-29.74%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.80%

-1.05%

-8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-7.20%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.02%

+0.85%

Volatility

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund (TGEIX) at 0.88%. This indicates that TGGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGGBXTGEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

0.88%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

3.54%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

4.35%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.84%

6.65%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

7.69%

-1.88%

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGGBX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TGEIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGGBX vs. TGEIX - Dividend Comparison

TGGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than TGEIX's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGEIX
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund
5.77%6.12%6.67%5.23%5.07%4.88%4.00%4.92%4.59%5.47%5.16%5.33%
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
3.97%4.12%2.99%3.65%1.97%1.93%3.70%4.18%0.50%1.88%2.91%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGGBX and TGEIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGGBX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to TGEIX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGGBX dropped -27.37% vs TGEIX's -46.33%.

TGEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGGBX and TGEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer