PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFSL vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFSL vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFSL achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than AMECX's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TFSL has underperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


TFSL

1D
0.95%
1M
8.54%
YTD
32.26%
6M
25.51%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.85%

AMECX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
5.75%
6M
5.27%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFSL vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation
32.26%15.95%-6.73%11.18%-12.98%7.13%-4.53%29.24%13.93%-18.48%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
5.75%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TFSL and AMECX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2007

0.50

The correlation between TFSL and AMECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFSL vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFSL
TFSL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TFSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TFSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFSL vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFSLAMECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.34

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

8.59

+1.80

TFSL vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFSL and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFSL vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFSL drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, which is greater than AMECX's maximum drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFSL and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFSLAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.52%

-41.92%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-6.13%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-8.58%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.94%

-15.78%

-23.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

-26.13%

-16.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.77%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-4.45%

-12.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

1.66%

+2.42%

Volatility

TFSL vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) at 2.24%. This indicates that TFSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFSLAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

2.24%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

5.82%

+10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.45%

7.41%

+15.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

9.46%

+14.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.52%

10.65%

+13.87%

Dividends

TFSL vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

TFSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than AMECX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.52%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%
TFSL
TFS Financial Corporation
6.63%8.45%9.00%7.69%7.84%6.30%6.35%5.28%5.21%3.95%2.36%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFSL and AMECX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFSL has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to AMECX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFSL dropped -45.52% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

AMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFSL and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer