PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFPM vs. MNSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFPM vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFPM achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -28.13% return.


TFPM

1D
4.14%
1M
-17.89%
YTD
-11.94%
6M
-15.62%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
28.25%
5Y*
10Y*

MNSO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
-28.13%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFPM vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-11.94%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%32.61%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-28.13%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-29.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TFPM and MNSO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.17

The correlation between TFPM and MNSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TFPM:

$6.04B

MNSO:

$4.03B

EPS

TFPM:

$1.51

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

PE Ratio

TFPM:

19.28

MNSO:

13.40

PEG Ratio

TFPM:

0.15

MNSO:

0.08

PS Ratio

TFPM:

13.23

MNSO:

1.21

PB Ratio

TFPM:

2.80

MNSO:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFPM:

$453.24M

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFPM:

$337.23M

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

TFPM:

$354.95M

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFPM vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFPM vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFPMMNSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.90

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

-0.50

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

-0.94

+2.58

TFPM vs. MNSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFPM and MNSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFPM vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFPM drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum MNSO drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFPM and MNSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFPMMNSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-86.58%

+50.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.87%

-51.47%

+16.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.87%

-54.05%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.27%

-56.44%

+27.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-45.53%

+32.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

27.33%

-15.15%

Volatility

TFPM vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) at 9.60%. This indicates that TFPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFPMMNSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.92%

9.60%

+6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.29%

23.05%

+11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.51%

39.85%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.45%

67.13%

-29.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.45%

68.59%

-31.14%

Dividends

TFPM vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

TFPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than MNSO's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.06%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.79%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%

Financials

TFPM vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
144.96M
5.65B
(TFPM) Total Revenue
(MNSO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TFPM values in USD, MNSO values in CNY

TFPM vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp and MINISO Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
72.0%
43.3%
Portfolio components
TFPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

TFPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

TFPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFPM and MNSO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFPM has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to MNSO (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFPM dropped -36.48% vs MNSO's -86.58%.

TFPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFPM and MNSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer