PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFNS vs. GPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFNS vs. GPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than GPZ's -19.37% return.


TFNS

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-2.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPZ

1D
-4.70%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-16.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. GPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TFNS
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
-5.36%10.41%
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
-19.37%7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and GPZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.68

TFNS vs. GPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TFNS
GPZ

Financial Services

97.1%
100.0%

Technology

1.9%

-

Industrials

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TFNS
97.1%
GPZ
100.0%

Technology

TFNS
1.9%
GPZ

-

Industrials

TFNS
0.9%
GPZ

-

Basic Materials

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Communication Services

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Consumer Defensive

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Energy

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Healthcare

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Real Estate

TFNS

-

GPZ
2.3%

Utilities

TFNS

-

GPZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFNS vs. GPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TFNS vs. GPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFNSGPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.44

+0.75

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. GPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum GPZ drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and GPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFNSGPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-31.72%

+17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-25.93%

+17.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-11.74%

+7.92%

Volatility

TFNS vs. GPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFNSGPZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

27.33%

-12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

27.33%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

27.33%

-12.29%

TFNS vs. GPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than GPZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFNS vs. GPZ - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than GPZ's 1.03% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFNS and GPZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.

GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.40% for GPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFNS and GPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer