PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLR vs. VRIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TFLR vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TFLR vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
-0.45%6.57%8.77%12.05%-0.41%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
0.90%5.05%6.81%7.37%1.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than VRIG's 0.90% return.


TFLR

1D
0.34%
1M
1.25%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.18%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
10Y*

VRIG

1D
0.06%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.12%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TFLR vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TFLR vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VRIG
VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLR vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFLRVRIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

5.20

-4.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

6.80

-5.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

3.21

-1.82

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

6.26

-4.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.50

52.80

-44.30

TFLR vs. VRIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the VRIG Sharpe Ratio of 5.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and VRIG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFLRVRIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

5.20

-4.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

0.89

+1.21

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and VRIG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TFLR vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, more than VRIG's 4.89% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.95%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
4.89%4.99%6.09%5.97%2.39%0.78%1.57%3.12%2.89%2.31%0.60%

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, smaller than the maximum VRIG drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and VRIG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLRVRIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-13.04%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.50%

-0.78%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.02%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.27%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.09%

+0.56%

Volatility

TFLR vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.18%. This indicates that TFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TFLRVRIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.18%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

0.37%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47%

0.93%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.75%

1.29%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.75%

3.83%

-0.08%