TFLR vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TFLR (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFLR is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. TFLR is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TFLR returned 7.80%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

TFLR vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.11% return.

TFLR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 5.50%
• 3Y*: 7.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.21%
• 3Y*: 6.13%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: 3.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLR vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	1.41%	6.57%	8.77%	12.05%	-0.44%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	2.11%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and FLTR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022	0.16

Return for Risk

TFLR vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLR

TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 78
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLR vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFLR	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	6.52	-3.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	12.09	-7.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	3.02	-1.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	16.69	-14.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	97.81	-86.23

TFLR vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFLR	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-17.84%	+13.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-0.31%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-1.93%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.08%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-0.67%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.05%	+0.43%

Volatility

TFLR vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that TFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFLR	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	0.29%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	0.65%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98%	0.80%	+1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.66%	2.13%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.66%	5.00%	-1.34%

TFLR vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFLR vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than FLTR's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	4.72%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	6.76%	6.93%	8.18%	7.76%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFLR and FLTR in my portfolio?

TFLR and FLTR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFLR or FLTR?

TFLR has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLR dropped -4.01% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which ETF is better, TFLR or FLTR?

On 3-year performance, TFLR leads with 7.80% vs 6.13% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFLR or FLTR?

Over the 3-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 7.80% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFLR or FLTR?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFLR or FLTR?

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 4.72% for FLTR.

What is the main difference between TFLR and FLTR?

TFLR is categorized as Bank Loan, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TFLR and 0.14% for FLTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.52 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.