TFLO vs. FNDX
TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFLO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TFLO returned 2.37%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for FNDX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TFLO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
TFLO vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFLO achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TFLO has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 2.37%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.
TFLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 15.49%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
TFLO vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.71% | 4.22% | 5.34% | 5.12% | 1.99% | -0.02% | 0.43% | 2.04% | 1.76% | 1.01% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.49% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFLO and FNDX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.05 |
The correlation between TFLO and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (5 years) to 0.03 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFLO vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
TFLO
FNDX
TFLO vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFLO | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +47.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 14.07 | 1.56 | +12.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 203.31 | 5.23 | +198.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 831.79 | 20.31 | +811.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFLO vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFLO drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLO and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFLO | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -37.72% | +32.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -6.06% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.04% | -16.30% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.13% | -19.06% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.16% | -37.72% | +37.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -3.55% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.56% | -1.56% |
Volatility
TFLO vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) is 0.07%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that TFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFLO | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.07% | 3.18% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 7.58% | -7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28% | 10.45% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 15.21% | -14.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 17.51% | -17.06% |
TFLO vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TFLO vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
TFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
TFLO iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.89% | 4.16% | 5.21% | 4.88% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.31% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFLO and FNDX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLO dropped -5.01% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.45% vs 2.37% for TFLO. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.
TFLO is categorized as Government Bonds, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TFLO and 0.25% for FNDX.
TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFLO and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer