TFFI vs. TOT

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) and TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TFFI charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for TOT.

Performance

TFFI vs. TOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TFFI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFFI vs. TOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF	-0.34%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TFFI and TOT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.12

Return for Risk

TFFI vs. TOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TFFI vs. TOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFFI drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, roughly equal to the maximum TOT drawdown of -4.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFFI and TOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFFI	TOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-4.26%	+0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-0.62%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-1.45%	-0.20%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TFFI	TOT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.06%	14.24%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.06%	14.24%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.06%	14.24%	-6.18%

TFFI vs. TOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFFI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TOT's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFFI vs. TOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TFFI nor TOT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFFI and TOT in my portfolio?

TFFI and TOT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TFFI or TOT?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFFI or TOT?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFFI or TOT?

TFFI and TOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TFFI and TOT?

They also come from different issuers: Chesapeake and LionShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TFFI and 0.07% for TOT.