TFFI vs. TACN
TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. TFFI charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.
Performance
TFFI vs. TACN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TFFI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFFI vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.03% |
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFFI and TACN is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFFI vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFFI vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFFI drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFFI and TACN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFFI | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -10.98% | +6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -1.18% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -2.42% | +0.77% |
Volatility
TFFI vs. TACN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFFI | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.06% | 17.59% | -9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 17.59% | -9.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 17.59% | -9.53% |
TFFI vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFFI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFFI vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison
Neither TFFI nor TACN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TFFI and TACN have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.
TFFI and TACN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Chesapeake and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TFFI and 0.20% for TACN.
Find the right allocation for TFFI and TACN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer