TFCGX vs. EMCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX).
TFCGX is managed by Taylor Frigon Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 27, 2016. EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995.
Performance
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund | -11.47% | 9.60% | 20.36% | 20.16% | -48.26% | 10.57% | 79.36% | 32.17% | 0.00% | 21.32% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -0.57% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 20.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFCGX achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's -0.57% return.
TFCGX
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -11.47%
- 6M
- -10.53%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- -6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCAX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TFCGX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
TFCGX
EMCAX
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFCGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.41 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 0.72 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.09 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.74 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | 3.00 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFCGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.41 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.12 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.44 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFCGX and EMCAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
TFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFCGX Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.28% | 5.09% | 1.71% | 1.88% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than EMCAX's maximum drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFCGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -51.81% | -45.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -10.15% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.73% | -30.60% | -67.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.87% | -6.22% | -90.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.24% | -13.33% | -16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 2.50% | +3.79% |
Volatility
TFCGX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 5.42%. This indicates that TFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFCGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 5.42% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 10.49% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.15% | 17.50% | +14.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,319.21% | 18.18% | +1,301.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 970.34% | 20.21% | +950.13% |