PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFCGX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFCGX achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.


TFCGX

1D
2.32%
1M
8.29%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.94%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*

CMCIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.56%
1Y
0.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
13.82%9.60%20.36%11.45%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
1.72%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TFCGX and CMCIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.63

The correlation between TFCGX and CMCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFCGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFCGX
TFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFCGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

-0.02

+1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

0.08

+1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.01

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

-0.04

+1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.14

-0.09

+5.23

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFCGX and CMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFCGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

-0.02

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.32

-0.31

Drawdowns

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFCGX drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFCGX and CMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCGXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-21.50%

-76.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-11.68%

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.97%

-10.79%

-85.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.41%

-6.44%

-24.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

4.98%

+1.39%

Volatility

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund (TFCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that TFCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCGXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

3.89%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

10.55%

+7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.73%

15.16%

+10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,319.20%

16.55%

+1,302.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

961.69%

16.55%

+945.14%

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFCGX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFCGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

TFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.18%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TFCGX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.28%5.09%1.71%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFCGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFCGX has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFCGX dropped -97.73% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.

TFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFCGX and CMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer