PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEST vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEST vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEST achieves a -8.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 144.27% return.


TEST

1D
-4.27%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-8.43%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
-13.25%
1M
12.03%
YTD
144.27%
6M
137.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEST vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEST and AMDW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEST vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEST vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TESTAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

3.57

-3.58

Drawdowns

TEST vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEST drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEST and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TESTAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-34.64%

+11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.44%

-16.46%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-14.61%

+4.22%

Volatility

TEST vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TESTAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.46%

82.70%

-50.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.46%

82.70%

-50.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

82.70%

-50.24%

TEST vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEST has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEST vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

TEST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.42%, less than AMDW's 34.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEST and AMDW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TEST.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 34.70%, compared with 14.42% for TEST.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TEST and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEST and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer