PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TESL vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TESL vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TESL achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.


TESL

1D
-6.80%
1M
-14.12%
YTD
-12.28%
6M
-17.99%
1Y
-31.81%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TESL vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
-12.28%-14.73%152.27%6.44%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TESL and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.03

The correlation between TESL and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TESL vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TESL
TESL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TESL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TESL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TESL vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TESLIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

2.22

-1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

16.56

-17.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

58.67

-59.65

TESL vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TESL and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TESL vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TESL drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TESL and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TESLIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.11%

-0.90%

-68.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.12%

-0.27%

-55.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.57%

-0.08%

-45.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-0.10%

-37.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.64%

0.08%

+32.56%

Volatility

TESL vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that TESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TESLIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.88%

0.17%

+15.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.68%

0.67%

+41.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.85%

0.89%

+56.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.05%

1.56%

+49.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.14%

1.56%

+48.58%

TESL vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TESL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TESL vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TESL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.22%, more than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
26.22%23.87%0.62%0.00%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


TESL and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TESL has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TESL dropped -69.11% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -31.81% for TESL. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for TESL.

TESL has the higher dividend yield at 26.22%, compared with 3.58% for IBIC.

TESL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. TESL tracks Actively Managed, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for TESL and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TESL and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer