TESL vs. EMLP
TESL (Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TESL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. TESL is passively managed, while EMLP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TESL returned 10.66%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for EMLP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TESL charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
TESL vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TESL achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 17.26% return.
TESL
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -6.31%
- 1Y
- -18.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
TESL vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TESL Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF | -6.31% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 2.57% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 17.26% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TESL and EMLP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between TESL and EMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TESL vs. EMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TESL
EMLP
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TESL
EMLP
-
Basic Materials
TESL
-
EMLP
Communication Services
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Energy
TESL
-
EMLP
Financial Services
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Healthcare
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Industrials
TESL
-
EMLP
Real Estate
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Technology
TESL
-
EMLP
-
Utilities
TESL
-
EMLP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TESL vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
TESL
EMLP
TESL vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TESL | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 4.37 | -4.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 12.50 | -13.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TESL vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TESL drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than EMLP's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TESL and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TESL | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.11% | -43.61% | -25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.12% | -4.94% | -51.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.12% | -11.47% | -44.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.11% | -14.59% | -54.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.87% | -1.40% | -40.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.76% | -5.73% | -32.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.81% | 1.72% | +32.09% |
Volatility
TESL vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) has a higher volatility of 18.50% compared to First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) at 3.63%. This indicates that TESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TESL | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.50% | 3.63% | +14.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.67% | 8.25% | +30.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.00% | 10.18% | +46.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.43% | 14.52% | +36.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 17.67% | +32.66% |
TESL vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TESL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
TESL vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
TESL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.62%, more than EMLP's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.77% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
TESL Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF | 23.62% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TESL and EMLP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TESL has higher volatility (18.50%) compared to EMLP (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TESL dropped -69.11% vs EMLP's -43.61%.
On 5-year performance, EMLP leads with 16.11% vs 10.66% for TESL. On fees, EMLP is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMLP has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLP is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for TESL.
TESL has the higher dividend yield at 23.62%, compared with 2.77% for EMLP.
TESL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for TESL and 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TESL and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer