TESL vs. CTA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TESL (Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TESL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. TESL is passively managed, while CTA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TESL returned 26.19%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for CTA. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. TESL charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.

Performance

TESL vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TESL achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 0.24% return.

TESL

• 1D: -6.80%
• 1M: -14.12%
• YTD: -12.28%
• 6M: -17.99%
• 1Y: -31.81%
• 3Y*: 26.19%
• 5Y*: 8.82%
• 10Y*: —

CTA

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -12.64%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: -0.16%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TESL vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TESL Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF	-12.28%	-14.73%	152.27%	58.33%	-48.61%
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.24%	0.88%	24.15%	-2.23%	9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TESL and CTA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2022	-0.09

Return for Risk

TESL vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TESL

TESL Risk / Return Rank: 5
TESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TESL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TESL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CTA

CTA Risk / Return Rank: 10
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TESL vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TESL	CTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	0.13	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	0.31	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.04	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	0.15	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	0.51	-1.49

TESL vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TESL and CTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TESL vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TESL drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TESL and CTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TESL	CTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.11%	-18.07%	-51.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.12%	-17.75%	-38.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.12%	-17.75%	-38.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.57%	-17.75%	-27.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.71%	-5.77%	-31.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.64%	5.13%	+27.51%

Volatility

TESL vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) at 5.30%. This indicates that TESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TESL	CTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.88%	5.30%	+10.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.68%	17.77%	+23.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.85%	20.39%	+37.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.05%	16.62%	+34.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.14%	16.62%	+33.52%

TESL vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TESL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

TESL vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

TESL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.22%, more than CTA's 5.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.43%	3.19%	4.80%	7.78%	6.58%
TESL Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF	26.22%	23.87%	0.62%	0.00%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TESL and CTA in my portfolio?

TESL and CTA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TESL or CTA?

TESL has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to CTA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TESL dropped -69.11% vs CTA's -18.07%.

Which ETF is better, TESL or CTA?

On 3-year performance, TESL leads with 26.19% vs 7.91% for CTA. On fees, CTA is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, CTA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TESL or CTA?

Over the 3-year period, TESL has performed better with a 26.19% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TESL or CTA?

CTA is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for TESL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TESL or CTA?

TESL has the higher dividend yield at 26.22%, compared with 5.43% for CTA.

What is the main difference between TESL and CTA?

TESL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CTA is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for TESL and 0.78% for CTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.