TERG vs. YCS
TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - TERG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). TERG is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. TERG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
TERG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 74.74% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 11.45% return.
TERG
- 1D
- -11.75%
- 1M
- -44.81%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- YTD
- 74.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
TERG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 74.74% | 20.91% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 11.45% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TERG and YCS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TERG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YCS
TERG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TERG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TERG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -58.90%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TERG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.90% | -49.56% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.90% | 0.00% | -58.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -19.80% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
TERG vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TERG | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.92% | 16.54% | +138.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.92% | 21.09% | +133.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.92% | 18.70% | +136.22% |
TERG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TERG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TERG nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TERG and YCS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
TERG and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TERG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 1.00% for YCS.
Find the right allocation for TERG and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer